A millionaire vanishes into thin air, and the film lets him stay gone.
Depicting the biography of a corrupt banker poses a cinematic dilemma. How can the intentions of an individual systematic contexts and historical eventualities be brought into harmony? Thomas Furhapters nearly one hour film Michael Berger Eine Hysterie turns this problem outward by not covering up the moment of speculation. The subject of the film, Austrian investment banker Michael Berger, who became a dollar millionaire through a risky hedge fund, remains a chimera an absent individual who also cannot be captured through his crime.
Direction
Fürhapter refuses to solve the puzzle he presents.
Editing
Speculation as formal strategy—brilliantly infuriating.
Director
Thomas Fürhapter
Trivia, insights & behind the scenes
Released in the lingering aftermath of the 2008 crash, the film channels specifically Austrian skepticism toward narrative closure—a cultural tendency toward productive frustration.
The 'hysteria' of the title refers not to Berger but to the interpretive frenzy around him; the film becomes about our desperate need for biographical explanations of systemic collapse.
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion — comments are spoiler-gated to your watch progress.
Discussion starters
AT
